Data & Society Reads Midterm Results as a Rejection of Tech Industry's AI Agenda

The research institute Data & Society says the US midterm elections amounted to a referendum on the tech industry, with voters rejecting what it calls the industry's vision of an unstoppable, AI-dominated future. In a statement published November 4, 2026, the group urged the next Congress to regulate AI and hold tech companies accountable.
- Data & Society called the November 2026 US midterms a rejection of the tech industry's agenda.
- The group says voters opposed unchecked data center development and the idea that AI expansion is inevitable.
- It says tech billionaires spent record amounts on races and that voters rejected that influence.
- Data & Society urges the next Congress to regulate AI and hold tech companies accountable.
A statement on the election results
Data & Society published its statement a day after the midterm elections. The organization describes the results as "an affirmation of American democracy, and a repudiation of corruption, cruelty, and nativism." It adds that the outcome also represents "a forceful rejection of the tech industry's agenda."
According to the group, Americans used their ballots to speak out against the industry's vision of an AI-dominated future. It argues that people had already voiced objections in their own communities with increasing urgency over the past year, particularly over unchecked data center development and oligarchic power.
Money, data centers and the inevitability argument
The statement takes aim at what it describes as the tech industry's central message: that AI expansion is an inevitability the public must simply accept and adapt to. Data & Society says voters showed they do not buy that story, and that their consent and the future of their communities are not for sale.
It also says tech billionaires put record amounts of money into races across the country, hoping to buy a favorable environment for their priorities. According to the organization, Americans rejected that approach. It describes voters across the political spectrum as expressing several strong preferences:
- against the influence of obscene private money in public matters
- against data center build-outs
- for an affordable economy
- for a different and more accountable politics
These are the organization's own interpretations of the results. The statement does not cite specific races, vote totals or polling to support them.
A call for democratic governance of AI
Data & Society does not argue against technology itself. The statement says technology can be a positive force in society, but that strong, democratic governance is needed to guard against new technologies such as AI being used to concentrate power, discipline workers, accelerate surveillance or raise prices.
The group says the American people have sent a clear message to the next Congress: regulate AI, hold tech companies accountable, and deliver material improvements that affect everyday life. It closes by saying it is time for policymakers to answer that call.
What it means
The statement is an advocacy position, not a neutral analysis, and it reflects how one research organization reads the election. Its significance lies in the framing: AI policy, data center construction and the political spending of tech executives are presented as live electoral issues rather than technical ones. For AI companies and lawmakers, the message from the group is that pressure for regulation and accountability is expected to continue into the next Congress.
Data & Society: A Referendum on the Tech Industry: Our Statement on the Midterm Elections

