Harvey's Connector Library is now generally available for legal teams

Bringing scattered context into one place

Harvey describes a familiar problem: reviewing an agreement means knowing how similar terms were handled before, what the other side has already said, and what the business or client needs. That information is often spread across document management systems, data rooms, contract platforms, and email and chat threads.

The Connector Library was developed with early access customers and offers a growing collection of connectors. According to Harvey, it gives the platform the context to produce more relevant answers and drafts. Write-back support starts with DMS platforms, so context flows into Harvey and finished work flows back to its source.

Reviewed connectors, agent suggestions and custom options

Harvey highlights three features of the library.

• Security review: Every connector goes through Harvey's security review and monitoring processes, with governed deployment. Harvey says this reduces the burden of due diligence for legal teams.
• Agent suggestions: Instead of picking a connector manually, users can let the Harvey Agent suggest relevant connectors based on the task. Once connected, Harvey brings that context into its analysis, with citations that let users trace answers back to the sources.
• Custom MCP connectors: If a tool is missing, teams can add a custom MCP connector for an internal system or third-party platform. Harvey says early access customers are connecting third-party MCPs for everything from business intelligence platforms to niche data sources, and have also connected their own context layers.

Docusign, Datasite, Finn Dixon & Herling and Ropes & Gray appear in the announcement alongside these points.

Two examples from practice

Harvey gives two scenarios. In the first, a vendor keeps suffering service outages and the company wants to know whether it can end the agreement. Harvey combines Jira outage tickets and IT team Slack threads with structured contract data already extracted by Docusign, including SLA thresholds, obligation history and termination rights. It then produces an analysis for review. When the user is ready, Harvey triggers a Docusign workflow to open a termination request, route approvals and send the notice for signature, without leaving Harvey.

In the second, a lawyer prepares for a CFO's deposition and needs to establish when the executive knew revenue forecasts were unreliable. Harvey drafts the outline from case materials in Everlaw, the firm's own work product in NetDocuments and the client's latest instructions in Outlook. Harvey says this grounds the draft in actual evidence, firm strategy and client priorities.

Intake and what comes next

The library also ties into Intake. Teams can configure connectors so employees can send a request to Legal from a channel such as Slack or Jira. Harvey then gathers the needed context, routes the request to the right agent or lawyer, and replies in the same thread.

Harvey calls the library a one-stop shop for connecting to every tool a legal team uses, regardless of the size of the technology provider, and says it will keep expanding it. It invites customers to say which tools matter most. Technology providers that want to join the curated library can find details through Harvey. Existing customers can enable connectors in their workspace, and prospective customers can request a demo.